"Daily Forex Outlook - US FOMC Hold Rates at 0.25%"

CURRENCY TRADING SUMMARY -28th January (00:30GMT)

U.S. Dollar Trading (USD) was strong for most of the day with stocks markets under pressure in Asia and Europe. The US Session managed a late stock rally after the FOMC held rates at 0.25% and left the statement broadly the same. The USD did gain however as one member Thomas Hoenig dissented in a hawkish turn of events. DJIA +41 points closing at 10236, S&P +5 points closing at 1097 and NASDAQ +17 points closing at 2221. Looking ahead, December Durable Goods Orders forecast at 2% vs. -0.7%. Also released, Weekly Jobless Claims forecast at 450k vs. 482k previously.

The Euro (EUR) broke through 1.4000 for the first time since July as the USD strengthened across the board. The Post FOMC USD strength sent the pair to 1.3993. With stocks off lows and EUR/JPY rallying higher the EUR/USD finished just above the key 1.4000 level. Overall the EUR/USD traded with a low of 1.3993 and a high of 1.4098 before closing at 1.4025.

The Japanese Yen (JPY) was the strongest currency in the market before the FOMC inspired USD/JPY move higher lifted the crosses. EUR/JPY traded at fresh 9 month lows near Y125 before bouncing along with GBP/JPY and AUD/JPY. December Japanese Trade Balance at Y545bn. Overall the USDJPY traded with a low of 89.32 and a high of 90.57 before closing the day around 89.95 in the New York session. UPDATE December Retail Sales -0.3% vs. 0.2% y/y.

The Sterling (GBP) held up better than most in the face of USD strength as EUR/GBP selling and GBP/JPY buying propelled cable back above 1.6200. January CBI Distributive Trades slipped to -8 vs. 13 previously but this overlooked. Overall the GBP/USD traded with a low of 1.6105 and a high of 1.6247 before closing the day at 1.6170 in the New York session.

The Australian Dollar (AUD) hit fresh month lows before bouncing as stocks and AUD/JPY rallied late in the US session. The downside has been in focus recently as Yen and USD strength take its toll due to falling stock markets. Also adding to downside pressure is concerns about Chinese monetary tightening. Overall the AUD/USD traded with a low of 0.8908 and a high of 0.9048 before closing the US session at 0.8960.

Oil & Gold (XAU) tested lower $1080 support before rebounding. Overall trading with a low of USD$1083 and high of USD$1102 before ending the New York session at USD$1088 an ounce. Continued to slide as sentiment remain weak breaking through $74 support. Crude Oil was up -$0.70 ending the New York session at $74.00.

Initial support at 74.00 (Intraday support) followed by 72.50 (Intraday Support). Initial resistance is now at 75.00 (Intraday Resistance) followed by 77.00 (Intraday Resistance).

"WORLD FOREX:Dollar Gains After FOMC Fuels Bets On Higher Rates "

NEW YORK (Dow Jones)--The dollar advanced against most of its rivals Wednesday after a dissent to the Federal Reserve's vote to leave interest rates near zero fueled speculation the U.S. might be moving closer to raising interest rates.

The euro plunged briefly below $1.40 for the first time since July 2009, while the yen dipped to an intraday low against the dollar after the Federal Open Market Committee's meeting, when Kansas City Fed President Thomas Hoenig voted against leaving short-term interest rates at ultra-low levels. Higher-yielding currencies also tumbled, led by the Australian dollar.

The U.K. pound was the best ...

"Forex Software Robots Really Work! Get One Now"

In the stockmarket craze that his been going on lately, many people are looking for ways to diversify their income and assets. In light of this, the forex market has quickly become one of the fastest growing markets of all time. If you want to make money in the forex market, there is no better time than now. Making pips and being able to keep them is the key strategy in forex. Although many people want to trade currency, most just don’t have the spare time. So, what is the perfect solution?

If you want to see how hundreds of people are making tons of money by using an automated robot, just click here now.

You need an automated forex robot that will automatically trade for you in the crucial moments when your not available. Having a forex robot is almost like being able to duplicate yourself. The creators of the best forex robot on the market have programmed their years of trading expertise and experience directly into the robots innards. No longer do you have to struggle trying to decide when it’s right to trade. Having automated forex software on your side is one of the wisest and smartest investments any serious or amateur forex trader could make.

Now, you are probably a little skeptical about the idea of an automated robot being able to successfully trade, which is completely fine. But, if you don’t mind, just check out the success hundreds of people are having with the best forex robot around. All you have to do is click here and see what I mean.

"SNB: Intervention Back on the Table"

Pull up a 1-year chart of the Euro against the Swiss Franc, and you’ll quickly notice a salient trend: the exchange rate has hovered slightly above €1.50 since last March, with three notable deviations. The first occurred last March, when the Swiss National Bank (SNB) intervened in currency markets on behalf of the Swiss Franc, causing the Franc to shoot up instantly by more than 5%. The second took place in June, when the SNB threatened (it may or may not have actually intervened) intervention again, and the Franc shot up in order to create a buffer zone. The final deviation can be seen at the end of December, when a generalized decline of the Euro also manifested itself against the Swiss Franc, as it fell significantly below the €1.50 threshold.

It’s not clear whether €1.50 was ever conveyed by the Swiss National Bank explicitly, or whether it was merely accepted implicitly by the forex markets. Regardless, traders certainly respected this boundary, and for most of 2009, dared not challenge it. At the end of December, as I said, there were two important developments, which bore on the EUR/CHF cross. First, credit downgrades and the (far-off) prospect of sovereign default in the EU set loose a wave of panic, after which the Euro has generally fallen. The second development was a subtle change in the wording of the SNB’s forex policy. Previously, it had promised to prevent any “appreciation” in the Swiss Franc, whereas now it is only interested in stopping an “excessive” appreciation.

It’s not clear whether the Swiss Franc suddenly blasted through the €1.50 because investors believe(d) it was undervalued, or if instead it merely got caught up in the Euro’s weakness. Perhaps, investors realized that now they had an excuse to sell the Euro and no longer had to worry about whether actually doing so would risk provoking the SNB. It was probably a combination of both.

For its part, the SNB (through its President and chief mouthpiece Philipp Hildebrand) is already sending subtle clues to the forex markets about the Franc’s prospects. Hildebrand recently told reporters both that “Raising interest rates would beinappropriate,” and “Since the recovery is still fragile, the current expansionary monetary stance will need to be maintained until the recovery strengthens and deflationary pressures recede.” In other words, those that bet on Franc’s appreciation shouldn’t expect any return on their investment, in the form of higher interest rates.

He also reiterated the SNB’s stance on the Franc more explicitly: “Our policy is clear: we will resolutely prevent an excessive appreciation as long as there are deflationary risks.” Given that the markets called his bluff in December, investors are unfazed: “The difference in the number of wagers by hedge funds and other large speculators on an advance in the franc compared with those on a drop, so-called net longs, was 13,926 on Jan. 12 compared with net shorts of 2,780 a week earlier.”

In all likelihood, the Franc will continue to hover around €1.50, only below that barrier, rather than above it. As long as the Franc remains basically stable, either in literally not moving, or in appreciating at a snail’s pace, the SNB probably won’t get involved. After all, the change in wording to its forex policy is a tacit admission that €1.50 is arbitrary and that perhaps the Franc could stand to gain a little bit, especially in the context of the EU fiscal issues. Not to mention that intervention is expensive and ineffective in the long-term.

If traders really get ahead of themselves, though, Hildebrand has already proven that he’s not afraid to act.

"Gold and the Euro? I thought it was Gold and the Dollar?!"

Let me preface this post, by noting that I try to avoid writing about gold, since there are some many other excellent analysts out there writing about the subject. But when there is a such a strong overlap between gold and forex markets, well, I just can’t resist!

Recently, gold prices have collapsed at virtually the same rate as the Euro, with the result being a near-record high short-term correlation between EUR/USD and gold prices. This has caused no shortage of confusion among gold-watchers, which are accustomed to seeing the strongest (inverse) correlation with the US Dollar. This change is causing everyone to rethink some classically held assumptions about gold prices.

The foremost of which is that gold is chiefly a hedge against the Dollar, which is a symbol for inflation and erosion of value. [In fact, analysts argue that gold has little real purpose (besides a handful of trivial practical uses, such as jewelry), especially since holders of gold don't receive interest, there is little reason to own it other than as a store of value]. Thus, as the Dollar has declined over the last five years, gold has soared. Investors who are nervous about perennial budget deficits in the US and the skyrocketing national debt, have turned to Gold because of the belief it will continue to hold its value even (or especially) if the US government is forced to devalue its debt by devaluing the Dollar. While this tenet underlies the gold/Dollar inverse relationship, the long and short of it is that investors typically buy gold when the Dollar falls, and vice versa. Thus, when the credit crisis struck and the Dollar rallied, gold prices fell, despite the fact that the US was now more likely to default on its debt.

In the last month, however, the Euro has taken center stage in dictating the price of gold. This is most likely because of the sovereign debt problems of certain EU countries. A not insignificant number of which well exceed the budget (not to exceed 3% of GDP per year) and debt (not to exceed 60% of GDP) limitations imposed on them by their membership in the EU. Recent credit rating downgrades have underscored an increasing likelihood of default, which has been duly noted both by the forex and gold markets. As the Euro has dropped (quite dramatically in fact), so has gold.

According to the current paradigm, this is not wholly unsurprising, since the Euro’s fall has naturally been mirrored by a rise in the Dollar. Thus, if you continue to look at gold prices in terms of the Dollar, it seems naturally that a rising Dollar is being accompanied by falling gold. On the other hand, the fact that the Dollar is suddenly rising has little to do with a change in US fundamentals, and instead reflects the fact that in forex, it’s impossible to short all currencies simultaneously, even if sometimes fundamentals would justify such an approach.

In other words, that certain EU member states are more likely to default on their respective debt obligations has limited bearing on whether the US will also default. [If anything, it increases the likelihood, since a default in the EU would likely send sovereign borrowing costs higher around the world, straining the ability of the US to continue borrowing]. By extension, the current drop in the price of gold is fundamentally irrational, especially when viewed relative to currency markets. To borrow a hackneyed expression, perhaps it’s time for a paradigm shift.

"New CFTC Forex Regulations Unpopular, but Worthwhile"

I try not to editorialize much when writing this blog. There are too many talking heads as it is, which is why I try not to interject own opinions into the facts. Admittedly, the notion of facts in forex is obviously a bit murky, but I stand by my approach, nonetheless. Today, I would like your permission to stray from the facts (well, not entirely) and offer my opinion on the recently proposed regulatory overhaul for trading forex.

For those of you who haven’t been following this story, let me give you an overview. On January, the U.S. Commodities Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) proposed a set of sweeping changes to the rules that currently govern forex trading in the US. Among the changes are beefed-up requirements for forex dealers which would be legally required to register with the CFTC as “retail foreign exchange dealers”, and satisfy certain capital adequacy requirements, aimed at mitigating counter-party risk (i.e. dealer bankruptcy.) In addition, “introducing brokers,” (i.e. those that act as intermediaries between customers and dealers) would be required to sign exclusivity agreements with dealers, who would in turn be required to vouch for their brokers. Last, but not least, would be a bombshell change that would shrink leverage (i.e. raise margin requirements) to a maximum of 10:1.

We have are now partially through a 60-day “comment period,” during which the CFTC is soliciting feedback from stakeholders to determine if and in what form it should ratify these changes. And feedback is indeed reverberating around the blogosphere (more so than traditional media, based on my observation). Most industry insiders are predictably opposed to the regulation, on the grounds that it will make them less competitive with their (lightly regulated) foreign counterparts. Based on an online poll, it seems the majority of forex traders are as well. On forums, many have promised to shift their accounts overseas (or are gloating about already having done so) as soon as the measures pass. Meanwhile, the blogger to come out most prominently in favor of the regulation, is none other than Karl Denninger, who champions the the potential increase in transparency in decrease as leverage, but notes that it will probably bring about the “Death of Retail Forex.”

Personally, I am inclined to agree with Denninger (though not his flawed math, nor his erroneous tirade against rollover fees), on the grounds that transparency – especially with regard to commissions, which are dissimulated and ultimately buried in spreads – can only benefit customers. In addition, requiring all brokers and dealers to register, while strengthening the CFTC’s jurisdiction over forex will surely go a long way towards minimizing fraud, which remains rampant and in disguise, even among major brokers. Interestingly, industry lobbyists have come out in tepid support of this measure, but only because it will also raise the barriers of the entry.

As for the clause that aims to limit margin – and is really the only one that anyone is seriously protesting – this is also a step in the right direction. While libertarians and the 1% of traders that have turned a profit employing 100:1 leverage (the current U.S industry standard) will surely disagree, I think that sometimes, people need to be protected from themselves. I don’t want to frame this debate in political terms, however, since at the end of the day, such high leverage is both de-stabilizing to the market, and unnecessary. It’s destabilizing, because of the massive speculation it invites, and its resulting contribution to volatility and systemic risk, and unnecessary because it’s impossible to produce a viable trading strategy that’s built on borrowing 100 times as much money as you are able to commit. For the sake of comparison, consider that the average hedge fund, its reputation for excessive risk-taking not withstanding, will rarely employ leverage greater than 2:1. How about another comparison: Has 100:1 leverage (i.e. 1% down-payment) been good for the housing market, from both the standpoint of individual and society?

As for the argument that retail traders will instead send their money off-shore to gamble (cough, I mean trade), well I suppose that’s possible. But given that a related piece of recent regulation has been very successful at preventing Americans from patronizing offshore casinos, I’m sure the government can ensure a high rate of adherence with this piece as well. But obviously, this too, is a highly charged political issue, and it’s probably not practical to examine forex from this angle.

In the end, I think the government has (rightly) identified retail forex as the casino it is, and is finally taking steps to make it legitimate. For regular readers of the Forex Blog and those that follow its implicit approach (i.e. not churning your portfolio on a daily, or even weekly basis), I am confident that this regulation, if approved, will NOT adversely affect you. As for everyone else, maybe it’s time to either re-think your strategy, or ask yourself whether trading forex is still right for you.

"What is Forex?"

The Foreign Exchange market, also referred to as the "Forex" or FX market, is the largest financial market in the world, with a daily average turnover of well over US$1 trillion -- 30 times larger than the combined volume of all U.S. equity markets. Unlike other financial markets, the forex market has no physical location or central exchange. It is an over-the-counter market where buyers and sellers including banks, corporations, and private investors conduct business. A true 24-hour market, currency trading begins each day in Sydney, and moves around the globe as the business day begins in each financial center, first to Tokyo, London, and New York.the unmatched liquidity and around-the-clock global activity make forex the ideal market for active traders.